Archive for January 23rd, 2013


Not so long ago, they would have called him a Mad Scientist:

From The Independent:

Professor George Church of Harvard Medical School is one of the world’s leading geneticists and believes his Neanderthal bone-sample analysis is now complete enough to reconstruct their DNA.

Although the 58-year-old is not certain his plan would work, he says he is now ready to put theory into practice.

Speaking to the German magazine Der Spiegel, Professor Church said: “Now I need an adventurous female human…It depends on a hell of a lot of things, but I think it can be done.”

Professor Church’s plan is to create artificial Neanderthal DNA based on the genetic code found in bone samples, then put this DNA into stem cells.

These cells would then be injected into a human embryo in the early stages of life, and would be strong enough to steer the embryo’s development along Neanderthal lines rather than Sapien.

After a few days growing in a laboratory the ‘neo-Neanderthal’ embryo would be implanted into the womb of the surrogate mother.

Professor Church is one of the scientists who helped initiate the Human Genome Project that successfully mapped human DNA, and believes that bringing Neanderthals back to life would have major benefits for mankind.

Rather than the primitive brutes they are often stereotyped as, Professor Church believes Neanderthals were highly intelligent, perhaps even more intelligent than humans.

Although they became extinct 33,000 years ago, Neanderthals were already using basic tools and it is believed their brains were roughly the same size as ours.

Professor Church told Der Spiegel: “Neanderthals might think differently than we do. They could even be more intelligent than us.”

He added: “When the time comes to deal with an epidemic or getting off the planet, it’s conceivable that their way of thinking could be beneficial.”

Human cloning is illegal in many countries, but as Professor Church is theoretically dealing with a Neanderthal, not a Homo Sapien, existing laws may not apply.

As well as the ethical concerns of creating a neo-Neanderthal, scientists believe the resultant baby could lack immunity to modern diseases, and may not survive.

There are further concerns that the process might lead to deformities, and there are also obvious risks to the surrogate mother.

Bioethicist Bernard Rollin of Colorado State University has voiced his uncertainty over how a Neanderthal would fit into the modern world.

He said: “I don’t think it’s fair to put people… into a circumstance where they are going to be mocked and possibly feared.”

And Philippa Taylor of the Christian Medical Fellowship said: “It is hard to know where to begin with the ethical and safety concerns.”


Read Full Post »


Andrew Bacevich

…if Andrew Bacevich got to define the term. In an article in the latest  American Conservative, “Counterculture Conservatism“, he outlines a humane sort of political philosophy, one that values smallness, is hostile to militarism and empire, sees economic disparity as a huge problem, and believes in stewardship of the environment. (The magazine seems to have adopted an online format that no longer makes it possible to download articles or cut and paste from them, alas. Unless I can figure it out, you will have to take my word for it).

The only problem with this is I suspect few who call themselves conservative would claim these views as their own. Heck, even the issue of  TAC that featured Mr Bacevich’s article also featured a full page color ad for Glenn Beck’s latest TV venture (!), as well as a tribute, from Pat Buchanan, to Richard Nixon, and another to the late Joe Sobran.

So I guess I will remain politically homeless…

Read Full Post »